Community Development includes everything related to neighborhood life - from our built environment (housing, schools, health centers, recreation facilities, libraries, parks etc) to all the services (education, healthcare, transportation, sanitation, judicial, etc) we need access to. If we want great neighborhoods, then we we must be involved in making them so - this is community development through community involvement.
Post Election Discussion on Rezoning 2018 - Let's Rebuild Cromwell Community Coalition
February 26, 2019 Testimony to the NYC Planning Commission on the Bay Street Corridor Rezoning
Honorable members of the NYC Planning Commission, The Let’s Rebuild Cromwell Community Coalition LRCCC) which has convened and discussed the Bay Street Corridor Rezoning with hundreds of individuals and many community and church groups throughout the north shore since 2016, share with you our most urgent recommendations based on those discussions as you are all important actors in this ULURP process impacting the lives and livelihood of the people of Staten Island’s north shore. If we are to rezone, it must be worth it to the community that exists here now and be able to accommodate future residents and businesses. We believe that this rezoning, unlike no other in the city is set to deliver in one fell swoop, one of the most valuable waterfront communities to private development in the history of New York City development. That being said, the exchange of community benefits outside of affordable units being produced need to be of equal caliber. If we are giving up billions in waterfront value, then there should be billions in investment in the targeted and surrounding communities. In summary, we recommend if this rezoning is to be approved, it needs to do so with the following conditions:
From the Let’s Rebuild Cromwell Community Coalition 2019 -Our district needs the deepest affordability. With a third of our residents of low income and rent burdened, it’s the responsibility of government to ensure housing stabilization of affordable housing (25% at 60% AMI and 20% at 40% AMI). These formulas are more consistent with the economic demographics of existing residents in the Bay Street Corridor area. The homeless crisis affecting Staten islanders causes the worst hardships in the city as we have the least resources of affordable housing, rent controlled units or other tenant protections and subsidies. While the MIH program is not our preferred means to achieve affordable housing, we realize that no matter the community voice, the city is committed to this program as the means for achieving affordable housing goals. We believe the city should look at developing community land trusts to build 100% affordable housing as a more viable opportunity. In addition, we believe that any and all city properties should not be given up to private development but instead be used for affordable housing development or to create more programs like the federal ELLA Programs under HPD that offer the most diverse of incomes. Also, since most affordable housing on Staten Island is provided through small homeowners and small property owners, we believe there should be more programs to protect homeowners from bad tenants. We even believe that there may be innovative ways to use small property owners in the aid of individuals and families who are homeless. Finally, we believe achieving affordable housing through MIH or any mixed-income residential development will also require a public relations campaign. As evidenced with URBY, the optics, negative press and the lack of leadership on how such programs should work has left a bad taste and fodder for those who do not support affordable housing. Negative rhetoric about low income tenants causes a bad reputation for Staten Island, thereby influencing a lull in the attraction of market rate tenants. -We believe city-owned properties should not be used for private development. City-owned properties should be developed for public use such as public housing, schools, or parks. Staten Island has limited public spaces with limited opportunities for developing space and facilities for the public good. We recommend using Lots A and B1 of the Bay Street Corridor Rezoning as sorely needed open sports fields (much like Miller Field in mid-island). Creating a field would also help alleviate resiliency issues our community experienced during Hurricanes like Irene and Sandy. Overall we believe building housing on the shoreline would be irresponsible and quite conflicting with the city’s own public policy on resiliency post-Hurricane Sandy. Our borough does not need another Build It Back program scenario. In addition, we recommend that the 3 properties unattached to the continuous Bay Street Rezoning should be separated from the rezoning and treated as individual parcels in search of variances as needed as they have no relationship to the proposed rezoned corridor. These properties should be reviewed in the context of overall north shore development and should include a community driven disposition process. -We believe that the rezoning should be in concert and directed by a viable plan for economic and community development such as the Maritime Education Recreation Culture corridor aka MERC. “The MERC corridor provides an opportunity to have Staten Island define development, rather than to have development define Staten Island.” Kelly Vilar With continuously delayed opening of the Empire Outlet that has gone from high end stores to anyone who will sign a lease; a failed observation wheel project and an already crumbling infrastructure with gentrification already creeping into the community, we believe the MERC offers a plan that cuts through many of these issues because it’s responsible development with input from communities that are invested in its success because it benefits the existing communities of the north shore, Staten Island and the city overall. We propose the MERC Corridor plan--- Maritime Education, Recreation & Cultural Corridor. While the MERC is not a housing plan, we believe it could be a viable plan for community benefits that complement the Borough of Staten Island. MERC is a plan to create and enhance our north shore waterfront as an enclave for Maritime uses for education, recreation and waterfront heritage cultural opportunities. The fact is our north shore has all the makings of MERC and simply needs incentives to further these opportunities which are already at the threshold of new maritime-related industries that offer promise for economic development. MERC fits in nicely with existing proposals and plans for the continuous walkable north shore waterfront, bike paths and destinations for tourists and residents with much-improved wayfinding and purposeful development. The north shore is primed to be a MERC corridor. Our need now is to be intentional in planning and attracting public and private funding support for such opportunities. MARITIME EDUCATION: The north shore is home to several maritime education opportunities with programs at McKee High School, Harborview Elementary, and the coming of the Harbor middle school at Fort Wadsworth which could be the start of a Maritime Education Complex at Fort Wadsworth -a site where the U.S. Coast Guard is housed and includes underdeveloped federal property. Staten Island could easily become the maritime education capital for the northeast as there are various economic indicators pointing to a huge need to make up a very needed skilled workforce. For example, according to the NY Dept of Labor, New Yorkers only capture about 12% of the NY Harbor workforce. This is especially troubling as these are career-level jobs with multiple entry-level opportunities. We believe there is room for opportunity to expand SUNY Maritime, NY Harbor High School and others to train pilots, captains, deckhands, and others for maritime careers. MARITIME RECREATION: The north shore is home to several existing opportunities for expansion of maritime recreation such SI Kayaking, Lyons Pool, the potential of a new Parks Department indoor pool, SI Sea Scouts, Gotham Whale, Citi Trek Tours, SI Fishing Association and many others. We recommend the creation of open fields, hydroponic farms, boating and fishing piers throughout the north shore line to complement MERC related activities (improving the community uses for Pier 1 and other pier locations outside of the BSC area from Fort Wadsworth to Snug Harbor to Mariner’s Harbor). As for Cromwell Recreation Center, we recommend the city not view Cromwell as a community benefit, but as a straightforward responsibility of the city of New York and the replacement of a valuable city asset totally outside the purview of the Bay Street Corridor Rezoning. We believe Cromwell Recreation must be built as a state of the art facility regardless of the approval of this rezoning. (See more under Aquatic Center section of this recommendations report.) We recommend Cromwell be complemented with sports fields, preferably lots A and B1 of the BSC as the community sorely lacks public space and programming outdoor sports for soccer, football, baseball, lacrosse, field hockey and others. We believe there is potential to become not only public facilities, but also locations for major sporting events for high school and college level games with easy public transportation and vehicle access. We recommend the transitioning of Lyons Pool into a pool in the summer and hockey rink in the winter like Lasker Rink in Central Park-Manhattan or at least find a location for an outdoor rink as none exists for sports level competitions in the borough. There are limited numbers of youth from the north shore exposed to sports such as these as facilities and public programs for them do not exist on the north shore or are cost prohibitive. Finally, on recreation, we recommend that both Tompkinsville and Tappen Park receive future planning enhanced by MERC related goals and significant community benefit investments for capital and programmatic needs as we view these parks as important centerpieces for community gatherings that will contribute greatly to both community and economic development uses. MARITIME CULTURE: On the cultural front, we believe we are on the verge of creating a viable cultural maritime community corridor that promotes a beautiful and responsible waterfront heritage which could someday be an example for the rest of NYC waterfronts. We are surrounded by the National Lighthouse Museum, Noble Maritime, the gorgeous Snug Harbor, Staten Island Museum, Museum of Maritime Navigation and Communication, and so much more. We believe there is room for providing waterfront for historic ships that not only provide the training ground for maritime education but can also create a tourist attraction (at a much lower cost than the Observation Wheel). Recent local events acknowledge unofficially that we are a MERC and are already attracting new opportunities such as the Billion Oyster Project’s work in Staten Island public schools and the Urban Assembly NY Harbor Schools ’s display at the Ferry Terminal. There are also opportunities to attract local, state and federal funding as every level of government has a special interest in developing NY Harbor. From Snug Harbor to Fort Wadsworth, the shoreline is filled with all sorts of opportunities for development with a variety of funding source potentials such as brownfield development opportunities to living breakwaters and untapped public and private environmental funding. There is room for restorative marine biology and infrastructural waterfront changes that could make the north shore a model for environmental clean up as we are home to one of the most contaminated shorelines on the east coast. Let’s use this opportunity to clean up our waterfront. -Build an Aquatic Center in the footprint of the Former Observation Wheel. With the failure of the Observation Wheel, we believe there is an opportunity to merge a negative development action with a positive one. In one of the last Mayor town hall, Mayor De Blasio promised the long-awaited indoor pool for Staten Island. We recommend the placement of the pool in the footprint of the Wheel as a major aquatic center. As the Borough President Oddo suggested, this pool could be a revenue generator much like Ocean Breeze sharing its time and space as a public facility for all. Moreover, it would be in a location consistent with the MERC, Cromwell and the potential of other recreational spaces along and adjacent to the waterfront. The aquatic center in this location as a state of the art facility with outdoor playgrounds could attract competitions nationally and at the college level. Additionally, if we are in fact aligning our land use to a MERC corridor- access to adequate swimming facilities will be tantamount. Additionally, investment in a state of the art aquatic and recreation centers with easy transportation access by virtue of being near the major transportation hub--the Staten Island Ferry and Bus Terminal, it becomes a location where all New Yorkers and out of town travelers could easily get to leaving room for revenue generation through competitive sports of all kinds. -We recommend the deep investment into new and existing schools not just as of need and right for all to receive a quality education, but also in response to the economic development goals of the BSC plan. Promotion of good schools in areas where investments will be made by market-rate buyers is key. We believe through the rezoning, there is an opportunity to invest in existing schools; to create and continue the encouragement of partnerships for expansion with off-island schools such as the NY Harbor School, Women’s Leadership Academy; and to develop the north shore as an educational model of schools attracting talented and diverse faculty, school administrators and resources. We believe if our schools are attractive, our communities will be attractive. -We recommend unequivocally that infrastructural guarantees and commitments to Staten Island must be in place before any rezoning is approved. Transportation (to include adequate paths for biking and pedestrians and improved wayfinding), schools, libraries, public recreation, environmental protection, uniformed services, and other relevant city services must be committed with a guaranteed city commitment of adequate resources to adhere to the needs and results of the Bay Street Corridor Rezoning and the change in demographics it will cause. The Let’s Rebuild Cromwell Community Coalition proposes the designation of the north shore Maritime Education & Recreation Cultural Corridor, also known as MERC all along the north shore border of Staten Island.
|
Maritime Education A Future for Staten Island Youth Captain Ann Fraioli, Curriculum & New Schools Developer New York Harbor Foundation Supporter of the New York Harbor School and Billion Oyster Project I feel very fortunate to have had the opportunity to learn about the Cromwell Center and what it meant to Staten Island. Clearly it was an amazing hub of community activity and a destination not only for the North Shore, but for the whole of Staten Island. Even more, I am thrilled to be a part of the MERC (Maritime Education & Recreation Corridor) conversation. MERC is a stunning opportunity to re-imagine our relationship with and access to a vital piece of waterfront. And as the name indicates, maritime education is an essential element of a community’s connection to its waterfront. Maritime education is an umbrella term that includes a vast array of pursuits and people. Despite the numerous possibilities that fall under the term, I believe the most effective maritime education is hands-on, interdisciplinary, skills based and project based. Whether it is data collection for marine science research, engine repair for a vessel, learning how to paddle a kayak, or building underwater ROVs, maritime education gets people connected to and caring about our harbor. Maritime education has something to offer people of all ages; however, I am especially excited about maritime education for our young people, our students. New York Harbor is the richest, most essential resource our city has to offer and our students deserve to have access to it, be educated about it and have job opportunities on it. Maritime education introduces students to meaningful work that gives them the skills and attitudes they need to be prepared for their own future; while also bringing great benefit to the city and its waterways. While maritime education does not necessarily have to lead to maritime employment, it is that at least 300,000 people in the Port of New York and New Jersey directly receive their employment from the port (compared to 160,000 people who work on Wall Street). Unfortunately, most of these 300,000 jobs are not held by New Yorkers. Our young people deserve to have education about and access to these local jobs, especially because many of these job pay well, are stable and have room for growth. Now truth be told, maritime education is an expensive endeavor: boats, docks, tools, science equipment, are all costly items. Although funding can present a challenge, it also presents an incredible opportunity to partner with organizations and industry from every corner of the harbor. These partnerships strengthen the educational experience, exposing students to maritime professionals and allowing students to see firsthand the scores of jobs and opportunities that await them here in their own city. Having spent the last fourteen years working with middle and high school students through my work with New York Harbor School and Billion Oyster Project, I am extremely excited about the prospect of opening a Harbor Middle School on Staten Island. The north shore is already home to a fantastic maritime elementary school, P.S. 59 Harbor View. The development of MERC along the North Shore seems to be an indication that Staten Island is ready to embrace maritime education in an even fuller way. Together we can create a network of Harbor Schools that promotes maritime education and prepares our students for a bright and prosperous future. 
Reclaim Our Harbors through Maritime Education article excerpt
Isabel Bruschi, West Brighton - Port Richmond High School Student “We like to call the waterfront ‘New York’s sixth borough’ these days, but really it’s the first borough,” observed Joshua Laird, the commissioner of National Parks of New York Harbor, “It predates the city and allows it to thrive”. New York City became the center of trade for the United States with the opening of the Erie Canal in 1825. It brought livestock and agricultural goods out of the region around the Great Lakes, today known as the Midwest, into the population centers along the Eastern Seaboard and then to trade with the remaining colonial powers in the Caribbean, the Western Hemisphere, and Europe. Every day, the work taking place in our ports and harbors impacts our daily lives. Our ports serve as an entry point for everything from the gas that runs our cars to the food on our table to the computers on our desks. Although we benefit from our ports tremendously through imports and exports, we fail to take advantage of the maritime careers available. A miniscule twelve percent of New York City Harbor employees are actually natives of our five boroughs, we outsource some of our best paying jobs due to lack of education. On our own North Shore of Staten Island, the maritime world holds a myriad of employment opportunities and it is time for us to lead our youths to take back our waterfront. It is imperative that we reclaim our harbors and keep the passion for our waterfront alive and well. |